Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) - Search term: Result co...

The following programs and add-ons are particularly suitable for structural timber projects.

Main Program

To model your structure and determine the internal forces, you need one of the main programs. Depending on the application area, you can use RFEM 6 or RSTAB 9.

• RSTAB: Analysis of planar or spatial frame & truss structures
• RFEM: Finite element analysis of plate, wall, shell, and member structures

If your model has surface components, such as plates and walls, in addition to membe elements, you need RFEM. This program is the only one with the capability to analyze laminate or cross-laminated timber elements and curved objects.

Timber Design Add-on

Use the Timber Design add-on to design the timber components of your model. The design checks in compliance with specific standards cover both members (bending beams, columns) and surfaces (plates, walls). For columns, the stability analysis according to the equivalent member method or the second order analysis is performed.

You can perform the ultimate and serviceability limit state design checks, as well as the fire resistance design according to the following standards:

• EN 1995 – including National Annexes
• SIA 265
• NTC
• NDS
• CSA O86
• GB 50005
• AS 1720

In the fire resistance design, the charring of a cross-section is taken into account for both the stiffness and the design.

Multilayer Surfaces Add-On

With the Multilayer Surfaces add-on for RFEM, you can analyze laminate and sandwich structures with user-defined layer structures. This allows you to design cross-laminated timber panels, for example.

If certain layers have nonlinear material behavior, you can assign the appropriate properties to them. Furthermore, this add-on allows provides you with the option to analyze curved surfaces.

Additional Add-ons

In case of special requirements for your timber structure, we recommend further add-ons and additional programs to help you solve the task.

If you need to perform seismic or vibration analysis, the dynamic analysis add-ons provide you with powerful tools for your structural analysis and design. The Modal Analysis add-on enables the calculation of natural frequencies, and in combination with the Response Spectrum Analysis add-on, you can also perform seismic analysis according to numerous standards.

If you are designing a building with a complicated shape, so that the determination of wind loads according to the relevant standards reaches its limits, the RWIND RWIND program will help you: Using a CFD analysis, you can determine the wind loads even for highly complex building shapes.

If the construction stages affect the final internal forces in a structure, or if the governing internal forces for the structural design result from certain construction stages, you should consider the modeling using the Construction Stages Analysis add-on. The Building Model add-on allows you to easily enter large multi-story timber structures.

Please note that the enveloping results are usually shown when displaying the results of design situations or result combinations.

There are three options to graphically display the results of deformations, internal forces, and support forces: Max and Min-values can be displayed separately. To display both envelopes from the extreme values on the model, select Max and Min-values.

Turbulence modeling is a critical aspect of computational fluid dynamics (CFD) that seeks to predict the behavior of turbulent flows. Turbulence models are essential for designing efficient and safe engineering applications, such as wind-structure interaction in order to structural analysis and design. Among the various approaches to turbulence modeling, three popular models are the Reynolds-Averaged Navier-Stokes (RANS), Unsteady Reynolds-Averaged Navier-Stokes (URANS), and Delayed Detached Eddy Simulation (DDES). Each model has its own unique features and applications.

RANS (Reynolds-Averaged Navier-Stokes)

The RANS approach is one of the most common methods used in turbulence modeling. It involves averaging the Navier-Stokes equations over time, which effectively smooths out the fluctuations of turbulence to provide a steady-state solution. This method simplifies the computational requirements significantly and is particularly useful for applications where the flow is steady or mildly unsteady. RANS models are extensively used in industrial applications due to their robustness and low computational cost. However, they can be less accurate in predicting complex flows with significant separation or strong unsteadiness.

URANS (Unsteady Reynolds-Averaged Navier-Stokes)

URANS extends the RANS approach by allowing for time-dependent changes in the flow field, making it capable of capturing unsteady phenomena. It still utilizes the Reynolds averaging of the Navier-Stokes equations but does not average the flow in time as strictly as RANS. This means URANS can model larger-scale transient flow features and oscillatory behaviors, which are typical in many practical engineering systems, such as vortex shedding from building corners. While URANS improves upon RANS in terms of capturing unsteadiness, it still employs eddy-viscosity models that may not adequately resolve finer turbulent structures.

DDES (Delayed Detached Eddy Simulation)

DDES is a hybrid approach that combines RANS and Large Eddy Simulation (LES) methodologies. In regions of the flow where the boundary layer is attached, DDES behaves like a RANS model, providing computational efficiency. In regions where the flow detaches and larger turbulent structures dominate, DDES switches to an LES mode, which resolves these structures more accurately. This method is particularly useful in complex flows involving flow separation, reattachment, and wake regions, such as building edges and corners. DDES offers a good balance between computational expense and accuracy, particularly in simulating high Reynolds number flows with significant unsteady and separated regions.

Conclusion

Choosing the right turbulence model depends largely on the specific requirements of the problem at hand, including the flow characteristics, accuracy needs, and available computational resources. RANS models are suitable for simpler, steady flows, while URANS provides better handling of unsteady phenomena. DDES, although computationally more demanding than RANS or URANS, offers superior accuracy in cases involving complex, unsteady separated flows. Each of these models has contributed significantly to advancements in fluid dynamics simulations, supporting engineers and researchers in developing more effective and efficient technological solutions.

In the standards, no torsion is taken into account in the stability analysis for the equivalent member method or the general method. The warning message is a reminder to the user of this fact.

First of all, the magnitude of the torsional stress or moments should be analyzed. Very small torsional moments in the members to be designed often prevent certain design formats. In order to neglect them and suppress the warning, you can change the limit values in the Ultimate Configuration. There is no normative basis for this limit value and therefore, no general specification. Find more information here:
Neglecting Torsion

In the case of open cross-sections, it can generally be assumed that the acting torsional moments are not transferred by primary torsion, but by secondary (warping) torsion. In RFEM 6 and RSTAB 9, the internal forces are initially only determined with six degrees of freedom without considering warping. For small acting torsional moments, it seems obvious to neglect the torsional stresses in the design. For large torsional moments, however, a calculation should be carried out with seven degrees of freedom in order to also consider the influence of the warping moment and the secondary torsional shear stresses. For this, you can use the Torsional Warping (7 DOF) for RFEM 6 / RSTAB 9 add-on, for example.

In RFEM 6 and RSTAB 9, the calculation parameters are no longer managed in a dialog box of the same name, but in the form of Static Analysis Settings in the Load Cases and Combinations category in the navigator.

There are tree analysis types preset:

• Geometrically linear
• Second-order (P-Δ)
• Large deformations

You can adjust the parameters of these analysis types or create more types.

In the "Load Cases & Combinations" dialog box, you can then assign the relevant static analysis setting (SA) to the load cases and load combinations.

The stiffening can be modeled using line releases as follows:

• Create a line with the planned beam dimensions.
• Open the "Edit Line" dialog box and assign a member with the cross-section of the planned stiffening to the line.
• Create a New Line Release in the "Special Objects" subfolder by right-clicking it.
• A dialog box appears where you can select the previously created line and then the created member (see the image).
• Create a new Line Release type and enter the appropriate support conditions in the dialog box according to your planned stiffening and fasteners.

• Select the original line and repeat Steps 2 through 5 to create a second reinforcement (for unsymmetric cross-sections, the corresponding section should be arranged with an angle of 180°).
• Assign the cross-section of the main beam to the original line.
• Now, you can assign a corresponding eccentricity to the stiffening beams.

Another option for applying stiffening is described in the following FAQ:

You can find another article on the subject of flexible timber joints on our website:

In order to specify a uniaxial load transfer for a plate, you can assign orthotropic properties to the surface. This way, you can control the stiffnesses for specific directions so that the loads are mainly transferred in one direction. You have two options.

Orthotropic Thickness for Isotropic Material

• Double-click the surface to open the dialog box for editing the slab.
• In the Thickness with Material section, click the button to the right, to create a new thickness.
• In the "New Thickness" dialog box, select the Shape Orthotropy thickness type.

• Switch to the "Shape Orthotropy" tab. The Effective Thicknesses orthotropy type is set by default.
• For the uniaxial load transfer, enter the effective thicknesses as orthotropic properties in such a way that the stiffness is very high in the desired main support direction and very low in the other direction.

• To consider the self-weight, you can apply a user-defined fictitious thickness that corresponds to the full surface thickness.
• Click OK to save the thickness.
• Click OK again in the "Edit Surface" dialog box to assign the thickness to the plate.

Orthotropic Material Model for Constant Thickness

• Double-click the surface to open the dialog box for editing the slab.
• In the Thickness with Material section, click the button to the right, to create a new material.
• In the "New Material" dialog box, select the material from the library as usual. However, change the material model to Orthotropic | Linear Elastic (Surfaces) (1). Also, activate the User-defined material option (2).

• Switch to the "Orthotropic | Linear Elastic (Surfaces)" tab.
• For a uniaxial load transfer, change the modulus of elasticity of the secondary load direction to a very small value. You can also specify very small values for the shear moduli in the secondary support direction. Furthermore, set the Poisson's ratios to zero.

• Click OK to save the material.
• Click OK again in the 'Edit Surface' dialog box to assign the material of the plate.

If a Rhino surface cannot be created by using the geometry type, it will not be transferred. This is the case, for example, of curved surfaces with more than four boundary lines. In the Rhino command history (_CommandHistory or the F2 key combination), you can find a list of warnings and errors displayed during the transfer process:

The CFD simulation (Computational Fluid Dynamics) is a valuable tool for various areas of engineering, design and research. In the following, we present some of the most important advantages of CFD simulations in more detail.

Cost Efficiency

Using CFD simulations in large or complex structural systems is much more cost-effective than performing physical experiments. For example, the digital wind simulation eliminates the costs for the production of prototypes, securing test facilities, and the use of special equipment

Saving Time with CFD Simulations

You can also save some time in the analysis process by using a CFD simulation. The setup and execution are quick and easy, requiring only a few clicks, which saves you a lot of time compared to setting up a physical test. As an engineer, you can thus benefit from iterative analysis processes. Test your designs in a virtual environment to perfect all aspects digitally before deciding on a physical prototype.

Detailed Visualization

For example, CFD provides you with flow patterns, pressure distributions, and other relevant physical phenomena that would be difficult or impossible to demonstrate experimentally. This additional information gives you an even better insight into the technical data of your project.

Scalability in CFD Simulations

Another advantage of the CFD simulations is the arbitrary scalability without great effort. Do you want to analyze different sizes or configurations of an analysis? In the digital flow tunnel, this is easily possible without any physical changes or new prototypes. A CFD simulation provides you with a wider range of scenarios and analysis parameters.

Sustainability Due to CFD Simulations

Another benefit of the CFD simulation is that it requires fewer physical prototypes and experiments. Lower energy consumption and lower waste production is ideal for achieving sustainability goals, such as reduced material costs and addressing environmental concerns.

Complexity and Precision

A digital wind tunnel gives you the opportunity to accurately model complex geometries and fluid interactions. This would be difficult to replicate in an experimental setup. The precision of CFD allows you to analyze subtle effects and interactions in a controlled environment. At the same time, the program provides you with complex insights that enhance the comprehension and optimization of structural systems.

The CFD simulations are especially useful if you have a thorough comprehension of the underlying models and assumptions. In most cases, it is best to use a combination of CFD simulations and experimental tests to achieve comprehensive results. This gives you the opportunity to fully understand the behavior of your structures in flow situations.

Are you looking for a way to carry out CFD simulations for your projects? The powerful RWIND is a stand-alone program that allows you to perform flow simulations in various situations. Find more information about the latest program generation here: RWIND 2 .

The following programs and add-ons are perfectly suitable for your reinforced concrete projects.

Main Program

To model your structure and determine the internal forces, you need one of the main programs. Depending on the application area, you can use RFEM 6 or RSTAB 9.

• RSTAB: Analysis of planar or spatial frame & truss structures
• RFEM: Finite element analysis of plate, wall, shell, and member structures

If your model has surface components, such as plates and walls, in addition to membe elements, you need RFEM.

Concrete Design Add-on

Use the Concrete Design add-on to design the reinforced concrete components of your model. The design checks according to specific standard include not only members (bending beams, columns) and surfaces (plates, walls), but also surfaces susceptible to punching shear. For columns, the stability analysis according to the nominal curvature method is integrated in the add-on.

You can specify user-defined reinforcement or determine it by using the program. With these basic conditions, you can perform the ultimate and serviceability limit state design checks according to one of the following standards:

• EN 1992, including National Annexes
• ACI 318
• CSA A23.3
• SP 63.13330

The add-on also allows for deformation analyses for cracked reinforced concrete surfaces (state II) using the approximation methods described in the standards. Tension stiffening as well as creep and shrinkage can be taken into account.

Additional Add-ons

If you have special requirements for the reinforced concrete structure, we recommend further add-ons and additional programs to help you solve the task.

To use a cross-section that is not included in the extensive cross-section library of RFEM 6 or RSTAB 9, the RSECTION program helps you when modeling the cross-section including reinforcement. You can then design this cross-section as usual in the Concrete Design add-on.

If you need to perform seismic or vibration analysis, the dynamic analysis add-ons provide you with powerful tools for your structural analysis and design. The Modal Analysis add-on enables the calculation of natural frequencies, and in combination with the Response Spectrum Analysis add-on, you can also perform seismic analysis according to numerous standards.

If you are designing a building with a complicated shape, so that the determination of wind loads according to the relevant standards reaches its limits, the RWIND RWIND program will help you: Using a CFD analysis, you can determine the wind loads even for highly complex building shapes.

If the construction stages affect the final internal forces in a structure, or if the governing internal forces for the structural design result from certain construction stages, you should consider the modeling using the Construction Stages Analysis add-on. The Building Model add-on allows you to easily enter large multi-story concrete structures.

Basic Add-ons

If you design steel structures, you need the following add-ons in addition to RFEM or RSTAB:

• Steel Design
• Stress-Strain Analysis
• Stability
• Steel Joints

The Steel Design add-on allows you to perform stability analysis (lateral-torsional and torsional-flexural buckling) in addition to the normal cross-section design.

The Stress-Strain Analysis add-on calculates not only stresses, but also strains in members, surfaces, and solids.

Steel structures are usually slender structures so the stability plays an important role. Use Structure Stability add-on to calculate the effective lengths and critical load factors for a precise stability analysis.

Model the connections between members precisely and flexibly using the Steel Joints add-on that is based on FEA. The connections need to be loaded not only in the main load-bearing plane. Even if the connection is loaded about the "minor axis", you can dimension the connection using this add-on.

Additional Add-ons

If you have special requirements for steel design checks, there are other add-ons and additional programs available to support you in solving your special tasks.

To use a cross-section that is not included in the extensive cross-section library of RFEM 6 or RSTAB 9, the RSECTION program helps you when modeling the cross-section and calculating the section properties.

If you want to analyze the lateral-torsional buckling with the more accurate and cost-effective method with 7 degrees of freedom, you will need the Torsional Warping (7 DOF) add-on.

If it is necessary to consider the plastification of the material when determining the internal forces, you can use Nonlinear Material Behavior add-on.

The Modal Analysis add-on enables the calculation of natural frequencies, and in combination with the Response Spectrum Analysis add-on, you can also perform seismic analysis according to numerous standards.

If you are designing a building with a complicated shape, so that the wind load calculation according to the relevant standards reaches its limits, then the RWIND program will help you: Using a CFD analysis, it can determine wind loads even for the most complicated building shapes.

If the construction stages affect the final internal forces in a structure, or if the governing internal forces for the structural design result from certain construction stages, you can model this using the Construction Stages Analysis add-on.

The Building Model add-on allows you to easily enter large multi-story concrete structures.

For your design of lightweight steel structures, containing cables and membranes, the Form-Finding add-on can help you to determine the shape of the structure.

A reason for the calculation time taking a while with little utilization of your computer's processor can be caused by using the Iterative instead of the Direct solver. Both options control the method used for solving the equation system.

The direct solver is a method that uses matrix decomposition techniques, such as the LU decomposition, to solve the system of equations in a single step. This approach is generally more robust and can handle any type of problem, but it may require more memory and computational resources, especially for very large systems.
The iterative solver, such as the Conjugate Gradient method or the GMRES (Generalized Minimal Residual) method, solves the system of equations by iteratively refining the solution.

The solver method that leads to the quicker results depends on the complexity of the model as well as the size of the available main memory amount of RAM in the machine. If resources are not a concern when solving large complex models, then the Direct solver is recommended for a majority of the time and will be the quickest. Make sure to check this under the Static Analysis Settings within RFEM 6.

There can be several reasons for this error.

Missing Surface Reinforcement

In the surface with the punching nodes is no reinforcement available.

You can find out how to create surface reinforcement here: Surface Reinforcement

Missing Dimensions

In RFEM 6, the geometry of punching nodes is usually determined using the cross-section of the connected structural component (wall, column). If a slab or a plate is designed separately within a 2D positional analysis and thus no walls or columns in the form of surfaces or members exist in the model, RFEM cannot automatically determine the structural component dimensions. In this case, it is necessary to manually enter the dimensions:

Not Supported Nodes

In the case of punching nodes that are not supported by a nodal nor linear support, the dimensions of the connected components can be defined via the ultimate configurations.

More information can be found here: Ultimate Configurations (Punching)

Supported Nodes

In the case of punching nodes that are supported by a nodal nor linear support, which represent a connected component, you can specify the dimensions in the support settings.

More information can be found here:
Fictitious Columns (Nodal Supports) | Fictitious Wall (Line Supports)

Not Valid Nodes

In the punching nodes are located in the middle of a line load or a line support, no punching shear occurs. Therefore, these nodes are indicated as not valid.

The Structure Stability add-on is not dependent on the settings made in the Steel Design add-on. It is a global stability analysis of the entire structure according to how the model is created. The setting of boundary conditions is only used for the design in the Steel Design add-on.
If you want the top flange to be supported, for example, we recommend using objects from Types for Members → Member Supports → Shear Panel. These objects are reflected in the results of the add-ons for dynamic and stability analysis.
In order to take into account the shear panel, it is necessary to activate this option of structural modification for the selected load cases or load combinations.

No, it is not possible to deactivate the Mia assistant. However, if the avatar is in a distracting position, you can simply move it by using the mouse.

Our AI assistant is continuously being developed. In the future, Mia will become much more integrated in RFEM and it is learning new things every day. Our goal is to make your work with RFEM even more intuitive and easier.

Mia provides you with the opportunity to use the capabilities of large language models (LLM) for the structural analysis and program operation of RFEM 6 and RSTAB 9.

Mia already offers a number of advantages:

Support 24/7, including weekends

Perhaps you know this situation, too: a project that still needs to be finished. Shortly before the end, problems arise for which you urgently need support, and the phone support has already closed.

Mia can help you to find a solution to your problem in this situation.

Better work efficiency

You will get the answers to your problems directly. You don't need to interrupt your work until the support has responded to your question.

Communication in almost any language

Mia has an integrated translation function. Communicate in the language that is easiest for you.

Easy access to information

You don't need to search through long articles to finally get the information you are looking for. Instead, you get exactly the information that is relevant to your question.

Easy to use

Simply describe your problem in natural language. It's no longer necessary to formulate complicated Google search queries and to search in countless documents for the results.

User friendliness

The AI function of Mia is directly integrated into the program interface of RFEM 6 and RSTAB 9; that is, exactly where the questions arise. It is no longer necessary to switch to the browser and open a specific website.

Free access

With Mia, you get free, fast access to the support team.

In the shortcut menu, you can find some important functions that support you when working with RFEM 6 and RSTAB 9.

Test Mia yourself. The answers are not always perfect, but are often amazingly good and effective. By the way, Mia also has a sense of humor.

More Information About Mia:

First, it is worth taking a look at the "Load Transfer" tab when editing the surface. If the load transfer direction is set to "Isotropic | FEM", the loads are not displayed until the load case or load combination has been calculated, as they must be calculated in a sub-model first. So make sure the results are available there.

The most important functions for using RFEM are described in the online manual. It also includes a short theoretical chapter on finite elements. Useful information about modeling and result evaluation for calculations according to the Finite Element Method can also be found in the technical articles of our Knowledge Base.

Of course, the documentation cannot replace the technical literature. To help you get started with finite elements, here are some recommended readings:

• Barth, Christian, & Rustler, Walter. (2013). Finite Elemente in der Baustatik-Praxis. (2nd ed.). Bauwerk. (➥ Amazon)
• Werkle, Horst. (2021). Finite Elemente in der Baustatik. (4th ed.). Springer Vieweg. (➥ Amazon)
• Nasdala, Lutz. (2015). FEM-Formelsammlung für Statik und Dynamik. (3rd ed.). Springer Vieweg. (➥ Amazon)
• Němec, Ivan. (2010). Finite Element Analysis of Structures – Principles and Praxis. Shaker-Verlag. (➥ Amazon)
• De Souza Neto, Eduardo A. (2008). Computational Methods for Plasticity – Theory and Applications. Wiley. (➥ Amazon)
• Rombach, Günter. (2000). Anwendung der finiten Elemente im Betonbau. Ernst & Sohn. (➥ Amazon)

This list is only a small selection of the recommendations. You can also find further technical literature in the references of the mentioned works.

You can access the requently used functions and commands in the program by using the integrated keyboard functions (shortcuts). For example, to print a graphic, the corresponding keyboard shortcut is [Ctrl]+[V]. Some important keyboard functions are listed in Chapter Keyboard Functions of the RFEM 5 manual.

If you want to assign user-defined shortcuts in RFEM 6 or RSTAB 9, proceed as follows:

1. In the Options menu, select the Customize Menus and Toolbars function.
2. All commands are sorted by category in the "Customize" dialog box. Select the Category of the command in the left column.
3. Double-click the middle column (1) in the row of the command.
4. In the "Set Shortcut" dialog box, you can now enter a user-defined combination (2).
5. Click the Set button to assign the shortcut (3).

Please note that some key combinations may already be used by the operating system for other functions. Make sure that the combination you select does not conflict with any existing shortcut.

The process of creating temporary supports in RFEM 6 has changed since RFEM 5. In RFEM 5, they were created using the support function. In RFEM 6, you have two different options.

The first option is the definition of structural modifications; it is easier with the Construction Stages Analysis / RF-FORM-FINDING (see Link Describing Form-Finding Add-on for RFEM ) for more information about considering construction stages).

A detailed explanation of the temporary support definition has been given in the online manual.
Definition of Temporary Supports for Form-Finding

You can also find there a detailed description of the entire form-finding process.
Detailed Description of Form-Finding Process in RFEM 6

Furthermore, you can watch a free webinar about this.
Link to Internal Webinar on Form-Finding and Calculation of Membrane Structures

This action category no longer exists in RFEM 6 and RSTAB 9.
It is necessary to create the imperfection cases separately and assign them to the corresponding load case or load combination:

To create an imperfection load case, use the Data navigator (Imperfections → Imperfection Cases → right-click: New Imperfection Case) or directly in the "Load Cases and Combinations" dialog box; see the image.

Using the cross-section library, it is possible to display the unit stresses at the individual stress points of cross-sections. If you know the internal forces of the respective cross-section, you can quickly find a suitable cross-section without starting the stress calculation of the entire model.

Yes, you have to activate the "Nonlinearity" tab in the "New Member/Edit Member" dialog box; see Image 01.

In the "Nonlinearity" tab, you can then define a new member nonlinearity; see Image 02.

Accuracy of RWIND Results and Ratio of Accuracy Versus Cost

The RWIND program was designed to quickly and easily calculate wind flow around buildings in order to obtain pressure values on their surfaces and generate load forces. In order to meet this main goal, a number of compromises had to be made, such as allowing the use of a simplified model or a relatively coarse computational mesh. It is obvious that these simplifications affect the accuracy of the results. Increasing the accuracy of the results using a finer mesh and other user settings in RWIND is possible, but this process may not be easy and requires sufficient experience with CFD simulations. An important question here is what is the acceptable ratio of effort and cost to the improvement in accuracy achieved. We recommend reading the CFD Project Accuracy vs. Effort article which deals with this issue in detail.

RWIND Error E315

When increasing the mesh density, memory and performance requirements do not grow linearly, but with the 3^rd to 4^th power (we have three spatial dimensions and also a reduction of the time step is necessary). This not only leads to a significant slowdown of the calculation, but also various problems can start to appear, which are usually related to the fact that the program approaches its limits or the limits of the hardware used. These problems also include error E315 which indicates a general failure inside the OpenFOAM© calculation modules – such as memory allocation failure, loss of numerical precision, and so on. The specific reasons for the failure can be different. More detailed information can be found from the relevant Log File.

RWIND Customer Support and its Limits

Dlubal customer support always tries to help RWIND users who encounter any problems. However, numerical simulations of wind flow can be very complex and results cannot generally be guaranteed. This is due to the fact that there is still no mathematical proof of the existence and uniqueness of the solution of the Navier-Stokes equations that describe this flow and which RWIND solves numerically using the finite volume method. Although the calculation converges to the correct solution in most cases, a failure of the calculation cannot be excluded. In the event that a calculation failure occurs in a large and complex project, assistance can be very time-consuming. If you are interested in additional extended assistance, please Contact Our Sales Team.

Regular expressions allow you to convert several objects, such as an entire IPE section series, by a single entry.

Example

Conversion of, for example, IPE120 in Tekla to IPE 120 | Euronorm 19-57; ... | SZS in RFEM 6 should also work for all other cross-sections of the IPE cross-section series.

In order to create a conversion for the entire IPE cross-section series, the regular expression is structured as follows:

For the expression (\d+), you can enter any decimal number. (IPE200, IPE300,...)

The expression $1 refers to the entered decimal number. In the following image, the regular expression has been added to the Tekla conversion table.

If two decimal numbers are used, the expression $1 refers to the first number and $2 refers to the second number. The following table shows this, using the example of the material conversion.

This article shows and explains possible problems when defining regular expressions.

The cross-section name 400*400 is not converted with the expression (\d+)*(\d+).

The asterisk * has a special meaning in regular expressions, and is therefore not interpreted as a simple character. To use the asterisk as a single character in a regular expression, you can write it with a backslash \ to invalidate its special meaning.

The cross-section name RHS200*100*5 is not converted with the expression RHS(\d+)\*(\d+)\*(\d+).

If several similar regular expressions are used, this may result in the use of an incorrect regular expression (see the example in the image).

You can use the superscript ^ to specify using a regular expression only if it is valid at the beginning of the material or cross-section name. The expression ^(\d+)\*(\d+) is thus no longer valid for the RHS section, because this section name does not start with a number (such as 400x400).

How can I convert the material/cross-section from RFEM 6 regardless of the standard designation?

In contrast to RFEM 6, Revit and Tekla assign material and cross-section names regardless of the standards. Therefore, to convert, for example, an HEA 300 cross-section in RFEM 6 into an HEA 300 with no standard reference in Revit or Tekla, you can use the regular expression .*$ to ignore the standard designation in the name.

The choice between steady-state (by using RWIND Basic) and transient simulation (by using RWIND Pro) depends on the specific requirements of the wind analysis, the level of accuracy needed, and the computational resources available. Steady-state simulations are suitable for simpler, time-invariant analyses, while transient simulations are necessary for capturing the dynamic behavior of wind flow and its impact on structures over time, and are more accurate than steady-state simulation.

Parapets present a unique challenge in the analysis of wind loads on buildings due to their positioning and the complex flow patterns they generate. Their interaction with wind loads is influenced by several factors that contribute to their complicated behavior:

Height and Exposure

Parapets extend above the main roof level, exposing them to higher wind velocities and different flow patterns compared to lower parts of the building. This exposure means they can experience significantly different wind pressures, including uplift forces.

Geometry and Shape

The shape of the parapet—whether it is flat, crenellated, or has other architectural features—can affect how wind flows over and around it, leading to complex patterns of vortices and turbulence. These flow patterns can alter the distribution and magnitude of wind pressures on the parapet and adjacent roof areas.

Interaction with Building Shape

The overall shape of the building influences how wind flows around it, which in turn affects the wind loads on the parapet. For instance, wind flowing over a streamlined, aerodynamic building will behave differently from wind encountering a building with a more bluff body. This interaction can lead to areas of higher pressure or suction on the parapet that are difficult to predict without detailed analysis.

Vortex Shedding

Tall parapets on high-rise buildings can experience vortex shedding, where alternating vortices are shed from either side of the parapet, leading to oscillating pressures that can cause structural vibrations. These effects are highly dependent on the wind speed, parapet shape, and the building’s orientation to the wind.

Gust Effect

Parapets can be subjected to gusting effects, where short-duration increases in wind speed cause fluctuating loads. These transient effects are particularly important for the structural design of parapets to ensure they can withstand sudden wind load increases without failure.

Given these complexities, advanced simulation techniques such as computational fluid dynamics (CFD) are often employed to accurately predict the wind loads on parapets. Both steady-state and transient simulations play a role, but transient simulations provide a more detailed understanding of how parapets respond to varying wind conditions over time in RWIND 2 Pro. These simulations can capture the instantaneous effects of gusts, the development of vortices, and the impact of turbulent flow, which are critical for designing parapets to be both functional and safe under wind loading.

In the RSECTION program, you can analyze general steel or aluminum cross-sections and determine the effective section properties. For this, you need the Effective Sections program extension of RSECTION. If you have licensed this add-on, you can activate the Effective Section option for the calculation in the Base Data of the cross-section.

Then, define the standard according to which the calculation should be performed. Currently, the following options are available:

• EN 1993-1-1 and EN 1993-1-5
• EN 1993-1-3 (Cold Formed)
• EN 1999-1-1 (Aluminum)

The effective section properties depend on the internal forces of the cross-section. Therefore, create a load case and define one or more internal force constellations.

After the calculation, the effective section properties are displayed in the table. In the graphic, you can check the stresses on the effective section.

Once you have saved the cross-section, you can import it into RFEM or RSTAB to use it for further analyses.

The webinar Determination of Section Properties and Stress Analysis in RSECTION shows the modeling and calculation of a cold-formed section. You can find further information there.

Both RFEM and RSTAB are available for the structural analysis and design of temporary structures, such as carousels, roller coasters, stages, or grandstands. There are add-ons available for both main programs that you can use to design steel, aluminum and lightweight structures according to various standards. If you also want to analyze membrane and cable structures, RFEM is your tool of choice.

Main Programs RFEM and RSTAB

The main programs RFEM and RSTAB are used to define the model with its properties and actions. RFEM proves to be the more versatile option, as it can be used to analyze structures with surface components, such as membranes, in addition to pure member structures.

Available Standards

For the design of steel beam and cable structures, the following standards are available:

• EN 1993 (Eurocode 3)
• BS 5950 (British standard)
• AISC 360 (US standard)
• SIA 263 (Swiss standard)
• IS 800 (Indian standard)
• GB 50017 (Chinese standard)
• CSA S16 (Canadian standard)
• AS 4100 (Australian standard)
• NBR 8800 (Brazilian standard)
• SP 16.13330 (Russian standard)

Aluminum structures can be designed according to the following standards:

• EN 1999 (Eurocode 9)
• ADM (US standard)
• GB 50429 (Chinese standard)

Analysis and Design Add-ons

Design add-ons supplement the functionality of the main programs. In the design add-ons Steel Design and Aluminum Design, you can perform the ultimate and serviceability limit state design, as well as the stability analysis according to the standards listed above.

In the case of membrane and cable structures, the Form-Finding add-on facilitates your task to determine the shape of member and surface models subjected to axial forces. On the other hand, you can use the RWIND program to perform simulations in the digital wind tunnel for complex structures and to transfer the generated wind loads to RFEM.

Dynamic Analysis

If you need to perform a seismic or vibration analysis, the corresponding Dynamic Analysis add-ons are the perfect tools for determining natural frequencies and mode shapes, or for the analysis of external excitations.

In case of any questions about the Dlubal solution for temporary structures, our sales team will be happy to assist you.

The programs RFEM 6 and RSTAB 9 are connected to a personal Dlubal account. This also applies to the viewer or demo mode. To ensure that your partner can create a new account, all they need to do is to enter their email address and password.

After starting the trial or demo version and logging in, your partner can open the model. The usual view functions are available for viewing objects. However, the model cannot be edited, calculated, or saved.

Results can only be viewed in the same program version as the model was saved in!

The Form-Finding add-on is available for the structural FEA software RFEM, which you can use to search for the shape of a tensile membrane structure before the actual design.

Once you have modeled a supporting structure or a substructure in RFEM and defined membrane surfaces, you can analyze the global model according to the large deformation analysis.

Programs and Add-ons

Use the main program RFEM to define the model, including the properties and actions.

The Form-Finding add-on allows you to determine a shape of the member and surface models subjected to axial forces.

Use the RWIND program to perform simulations in the digital wind tunnel for complex structures and to transfer the generated wind loads to RFEM.

Depending on the design, you can use the add-ons Steel Design and Aluminum Design to design the structure.

If a seismic or vibration analysis is required, the Dynamic Analysis add-ons are the perfect tools for this.

In case of any questions about the Dlubal solution for tensile membrane structures, our sales team will be happy to assist you.

Both RFEM and RSTAB provide solution: There are numerous European and international standards as well as add-ons available for both programs that can facilitate your daily design work of aluminum and lighweight structures.

Main Programs RFEM and RSTAB

The main programs RFEM and RSTAB are used to define the model with its properties and actions. In addition to spatial beam structures, such as scaffolding or frame structures, you can also model membrane structures with RFEM. Thus, RFEM is the more versatile variant—especially if you work in other areas, such as solid construction.

Available Standards

• EN 1999 (Eurocode 9)
• ADM (US standard)
• GB 50429 (Chinese standard)

Add-ons for Aluminum and Lightweight Structure

Design add-ons supplement the functionality of the main programs. Use the Aluminum Design add-on to perform the ultimate and serviceability limit state design, as well as the stability analysis according to the standards listed above. The Torsional Warping (7 DOF) add-on allows you to also perform lateral-torsional buckling analysis with up to seven degrees of freedom.

The design checks can be carried out for a large number of standardized and parameterized cross-sections. Lightweight structures often includes special cross-sections, such as extruded sections. You can define it with the program RSECTION and use it for the design in RFEM or RSTAB.

In the case of membrane and cable structures, the Form-Finding add-on facilitates your task to determine the shape of member and surface models subjected to axial forces.

In case of any questions about the Dlubal solution for aluminum and lightweight structures, our sales team will be happy to assist you.